Make a New Normal

Ideologies Do Not Win

I hate to lose. I know you hate to lose. Losing sucks.

When our surrogates lose, we feel like we lose. When our surrogates win, we feel like we’ve won. And we make a dangerous decision about these wins and losses: that it is ideologies that win and lose on election day. It couldn’t be further from the truth. Ideologies never win. People win. It’s like those bumper stickers that read

Guns don’t kill people, I do.

We aren’t what we believe and our beliefs are never what elections are about. That’s why the media covers the horse race and we have questions like

Which candidate would you rather drink a beer with?

picture via Reuters

And other campaigns win and lose because of pictures like this one:

And as my father bemoans every election year about my grandmother

She voted for Ronald Reagan because she thought he was cute! She thought he was cute!!!

Cropped screenshot of Ronald Reagan from the t...
Cropped screenshot of Ronald Reagan from the trailer for the film Cowboy from Brooklyn. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

This statement is always accompanied with a groan and a head tilt that shouts for him

My own mother voted in a presidential election and based that vote entirely on the person’s looks!

And so it might be tempting for well-intentioned people to see an incumbent winning a recall by a few percentage points in which he outspent the challenger nearly 10-to-1 as some kind of referrendum or a declaritive victory for the conservative ideology, I caution you to remember:

File this under “Lessons we refuse to learn”

Ideologies do not win. People do. People who run particular campaigns promising particular things in a particular way. For all those watching Wisconsin yesterday and today, take the campaigns seriously, not their claims about conservatism and the end of labor. Take seriously the anti-recall sentiment. Take seriously the incredible amounts of outside cash that poured in for Scott Walker and how very much more corporate money there was than union money. Take seriously how unbalanced that spending was. Take seriously how narrow that victory is given all the advantages the incumbent started with. Take seriously the truth that a hypothetical recall of Tom Barrett in the state house with a 10-to-1 spending supremacy would no doubt yield a similar result of an incumbent victory.

Make no mistake that conservatism didn’t win last night: the Walker Campaign did. And with it comes a blueprint for the fall. Not a blueprint for ideology, but for campaigning:

And Caesar’s spirit, ranging for revenge,
With Ate by his side come hot from hell,
Shall in these confines with a monarch’s voice
Cry ‘Havoc,’ and let slip the dogs of war;
That this foul deed shall smell above the earth
With carrion men, groaning for burial.

(Marc Antony, Julius Caesar)

If you don’t like it, it won’t matter, until your speech is equal to a millionaire’s.

6 responses

  1. Tom Downs Avatar
    Tom Downs

    Good observation, Drew. You might mention that Dad voted for Reagan the first time so as not to cancel Mom’s vote. Dad, the life-long union member, officer in his local. Then came the air traffic controlers strike and the President’s union busting. Buyers remorse set in and Mom and Dad cancelled each other out the next time around. As your Shakespear quote says, the decisions we make when voting are just too important to be taken lightly. The cost of choosing wrong is way too high.

    1. I know! Grandpa was so generous!

      The power of action is challenging for us, as Marc Antony’s response demonstrates the power, and danger, in first assassinating the emperor, and then in the revenge. The favorite quote: “Cry ‘Havoc,’ and let slip the dogs of war;” is ugly and demonstrates the beastly nature of war. What is chilling in our environment is that both claim the other has struck first. But what is lost in our current debate is that these “first actions” aren’t equal, and neither is the response. As I’ve said about the Schismatics in the church, they claim some social and undefinable transgression, but their response was to actually break canon law! There is something truly MAD (mutually assured destruction–the best acronym ever!) about this sort of behavior and relevant to this case as Walker’s pretext for the union-stripping bill was to intentionally put Wisconsin in the red when he inherited a balanced budget. His action, which was some vague response to the “evils” of his predecessor, was to intentionally break his government so that he could fix it, and by the way, do what he had wanted to do from the beginning. Surprise! “Cry, ‘Havoc’” indeed!

      Footnote: Barrett was the wrong candidate because he was the safe choice for the Dems. They should have run with a more compelling candidate that didn’t set up the rematch. It would have taken away the sense that this was undemocratic, when it is actually a true expression of democracy.

  2. Idealogies do matter and you will see the narcisst messiah blown out in November

  3. Obama vowed to go with public financing and then renegged when he saw how much money he could raise in the corporate sector. Now that the corporate sector has his measure he will be voted out

  4. We will have to agree to disagree, I stand by my prediction that Obama is going down in November

  5. […] Ideologies Do Not Win […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.