Make a New Normal

Why I needed to adopt the single space rule

"Why I needed to adopt the single space rule" a short piece about typography and change

It’s time.

I didn’t want to do it. My ego was bruised. My sense of right and wrong convinced I was right.

And yet…

It’s time. I am officially an advocate of the single space rule.

What’s the single space rule?

you ask. This is the use of a single space after punctuation at the end of a sentence. For anyone under the age of 30, this is a forgone conclusion. For artists, graphic designers, and journalists, this is a crusade they’ve long-since won.

For me, this comes as a begrudging reality of a part of modern typography and usage that I have been reluctantly rebelling against.

I learned to type with the two-space rule. I have been a punctuation rebel about the use of commas (we use them too sparingly) and advocate for many traditional matters (including the Oxford comma) while being a radical grammarian. I even wrote about this rejection three years ago in response to Farhad Manjoo’s popular piece for Slate.

Times change.

A few months after writing that defense of two-space punctuation, I began to switch my approach and never looked back. I didn’t draw attention to my single-space experience because I still reject the rigidity of modern grammarians. Most have long lost their interest in precise communication and are much more concerned with matters of grammar doctrine.

"Why I needed to adopt the single space rule" a  short piece about typography and change

What has changed for me was that in this one area I was a complete hypocrite. Click To Tweet

I support change, growth, transformation in spiritual and emotional health. I expect people to develop new theology through life-long Christian formation. I hope that the gospel can invite sacrifice and radical living. And my real, deep down reason for supporting the double-space is “I took typing in 7th grade.”

I changed.

My behavior changed before my mind changed. I was doing the single-space and believing myself a double-spacer. Until I realized that I didn’t remember the last time I regularly double-space.

The only choice I made was to entertain the notion that the single-space was better, necessary, possible. This made it easy to try it out. This led to using it regularly. And then it became habit.

It is long past due to acknowledge my change to myself and to my friends.

I am a single-space typer.

There are many ways to change, I think.

For some, the change has to be mental first. Jeff Goins had to accept that he was, in fact, a writer before he could accept the truth. For others, it is will, forcing themselves to change or to adopt new habits. And others use friends and communities to support them.

Whatever method you choose, it takes an action and acknowledgement. For me, the action was simple: I had to accept the possibility and hear it out. Then test it out and live it out.

And today I am accepting what has been true for a very long time. I like the single-space punctuation style and use it to communicate effectively. And I am thankful I have had the chance to learn why I should care.

Not care enough to get rid of the double spaces from all of that writing from before. I’m leaving them as a souvenir, an acknowledgement of a progression; a growth. Who I was and who I became. It’s not a big thing, but it is a thing.

I needed to change this part of me so that I could better reflect what is inside of me. And I do so happily.

 

5 responses

  1. Tom Downs Avatar
    Tom Downs

    As you might guess, I disagree. One subject not discussed by Farhad is that there are studies on readability. Some fonts are easier to read than others. spacing helps. I also suspect typographical experts carry a bias with origins in earlier methods of type setting. Spaces required little blank pieces of lead. Two spaces meant extra work and materials.
    But then, I’m ancient and have learned to can be a rebel by going backwards when everyone else is going forward.
    Tom

    1. I struggled for a long time with it, and still find the readability and clarity the essential argument. Manjoo’s argument is that modern typography has abolished the need for the double space, but that certainly isn’t true of all fonts. It also doesn’t necessarily scan easily, either.

      Having said that, the more compelling notion for me was that it felt like a holdover for me; an excuse. It no longer seemed like an entirely justified response and seemed at odds with my temperament, or at the very least, the style I want. For me, the fight against Strunk & White’s inconsistent and destructive crusade to inhibit the skill and creativity of so many is much more important! There are too many who have been brainwashed by that little book into believing our language is more restrictive than it really is. I’d rather put my interest in that cause.

  2. Just please, please, remember that often it’s the little things that can aid understanding. When I’m handed a program printed on red paper in a darkened theater, struggle to read fly-spec size type on a medicine bottle, try to figure out whether the time is scheduled at 12 noon or 12 midnight (instead of a.m. or p.m.–Latin now a most sincerely dead language) it makes me feel it’s not important that I understand, that I’m not worth the extra bother, that extra space that helps me understand.

    It reminds me that in our rush to get rid of the tyranny of Manners, we forget they may also serve a purpose: after all, not raising your arm too high while sipping tea keeps you from hitting your table mate in the nose with your elbow!

    Your obed. servant,
    Rebecca

  3. Anne Buchanan Avatar
    Anne Buchanan

    Just read this Drew. Personally, I don’t care what you do on your blog, but those who write for publication can do us professional editors a favor by following the single-space rule, which has been a fait accompli in publishing since the 1970s at least. That said, the double space isn’t a big deal. The search and replace is part of my standard, semi-automated manuscript prep. (Though I admit that reading the double space bothers me.) Also, for the record, not a fan of Strunk & White–though I’m a huge fan of E.B.

    1. Thank you, Anne. That is actually the more compelling argument for me: that the editors have had this as its standard for a long time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.