Make a New Normal

With Tragedy, the Rest is Distraction

This morning I was brought silent. What is tragedy is also now a lawsuit. And the impetus for a new piece of state legislation. A mother giving birth a couple of weeks ago has become an advocate for reform, but not the kind of reform that would bring back her son or protect someone else’s son.

my sweet boy
my sweet boy

In response to the conflicted reporting, I wrote a response on behalf of my family that I encourage you to read on our family blog. And after reading the nasty and uncharitable responses on the paper’s webpage, I am compelled to comment here.

Tragedy is precisely that. Tragedy. Tragedy can be accidental or intentional. It can be negligent or ignorant. It can be hopeful or desperate. But in the end, all it is, and will be, is tragedy.

We have plenty of platitudes that we can say about life and about experts and professionals and institutions. We can defend ourselves and say

All I want is accountability,

to hold people accountable, but this is a fool’s gambit of desperate lunging toward an apparition of punishment mixed with the optimistic hope it will never happen again to anyone. Anyone at all. Until it does. And the sad truth is that babies die in childbirth. No matter what we want to believe. Just as babies die in car accidents and cribs and in moments in which a parent’s eyes turn away and then…

What then is accountability? What do we hope to accomplish? What is supposed to happen? I’m reminded of class action lawsuits that threaten giant corporations to hold them accountable, and yet they still ____ (polute / discriminate / mislead / use lead paint / eradicate their competition / etc.). No matter how big the lawsuit, there is no hope for accountability in the legal system. And to be fair, neither is there accountability in the passing of legislation. Neither case will bring accountability. Because, after all, accountability is an illusion.

The accountability this mother seeks would no doubt end the practice. Sparrow Hospital, on the other hand wouldn’t bat an eyelash. Is that accountability? Is accountability ending careers or reducing options? Is that how we define the word?

How about new legislation? Would that satisfy? Sorry, not even the most well-crafted law would provide either the results Ms. Snyder hopes for or better healthcare in the state. Lansing hospitals already have way above average rates of cesarean sections, so funneling more mothers through its hospitals won’t provide better outcomes than the unsatisfactory ones they already maintain. Will that make things better? And bring needed change?

No, only tragedy. The tragedy that we have and the tragedy to come. No matter how you slice it, none of this changes that simple truth: this is but a tragedy. And anything else is a distraction from it.

8 responses

  1. I posted a long comment, but it seems to have gotten eaten by the internet.

    Let me understand you, you believe that there should be no consequences for a health care provider who ignores evidence based standards of care, and that a health care provider should not be liable for the safety of their practice and advice?

    1. I mean, I agree that sometimes a tragedy is just a tragedy and was unpreventable. Sometimes a tragedy is due to negligence and malpractice. If somebody believes that their health care provider was negligent or engaged in malpractice, then yes they should sue if exhausting other means of accountibility, like hospital and board review, was not successful.

      1. Drew Downs Avatar
        Drew Downs

        Absolutely. My wife and I have had our own run-ins with Sparrow and their treatment. I am just curious about what accountability looks like for them and what it looks like for the Greenhouse. One doesn’t sweat it and the other goes out of business. Should accountability demonstrate such discrepancy?

      2. Do we know that the birth center will go out of business? I think discrepency in accountibility is not fair, certainly, but I also think that a practioner who is endangering lives should not continue.

    2. Drew Downs Avatar
      Drew Downs

      I was saying that we should stop the blaming. That has nothing to do with the case. I also think that we are in a disagreement about whether or not the care was based on evidence.

      1. That is for the legal system to sort out, in part. The legal system is far from perfect, but I think that abandoning it would be worse.

  2. […] With Tragedy, the Rest is Distraction (drewdowns.net) Share this:TwitterMoreFacebookPinterestLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. […]

  3. kellton Avatar

    Opposition to The Greenhouse Birth Center is ignorance. Everyone gets on a soap box because they want to have someone to blame for something bad happening and no one wants to look in the mirror to place the blame. I’m sure their emotional distress over the trauma in their life keeps them from remembering that the Greenhouse DID inform them of potential risks and DID offer them every test that a hospital offers. I’m confused how these peoples’ CHOICE to reject these tests and CHOICE to proceed with delivery at the birth center is now the birth center’s fault. Shame on you all for making other peoples’ lives complete hell instead of putting some of it on yourselves too.

    Success comes when people help each other through trials – not when they bash something to death.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.